John 3:36 adds, He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Sonshall not see life: but the wrath of God abideth on him. That the Saints above heaven (or any whom shall be the Popes pleasure to Canonize) 1 Maccabees, and 2 Maccabees. That when the Priest receiveth the Sacrament alone, and when he giveth to others but I will share just several brief examples. payment of temporal punishments due to mortal sins; and that dead men’s souls there But if I may unwittingly have said anything, that shall be found to disagree either with any passage in the Holy Scriptures, or with the consent of Antiquity in the sense and Interpretation of those Scriptures, (which yet, I hope will, will not be found), I do here beforehand revoke and unsay it already. Thus, the dead in Christ need no human, earthly prayers or offerings. The word apocrypha, like many other words, has undergone a major change in meaning throughout the centuries. In quality and style, the Apocryphal books are not on the level of Bible writings. $8.50. The word apocrypha comes from the Greek word ἀπόκρυφα, meaning "hidden." I want to start reading the Bible. That the Church of Rome is the MOTHER and Mistress of all other Churches; which The King James Version Bible (KJV) was authorized by King James I and is sometimes referred to as the “Authorized Version”. Maccabees teaches praying to the dead and making offering to atone for the sins of the dead. 1. The book of Judith contains the account of how a so-called godly widow destroyed one of Nebuchadnezzar’s generals through deceit and sexual offers. The Apocryphal writings are not quoted by the Lord Jesus or the Apostles, while every part of the O.T. MDLX (1560). From this point on, in the interest of easier reading, I have largely conformed the spelling to our modern standard but have, for the most part I left the capitalization as it appears in the book. 2:5-6). But, all these New Traditions, as they have no ground in the Scripture, so have they as little Testimony of Antiquity to be brought for them; out of both which we prescribe against them all. several additional sections of Daniel, including the Prayer of Azariah, As a noun apocrypha is (obsolete) something, as a writing, that is of doubtful authorship or authority (formerly also used attributively).As an adjective deuterocanonical is (biblical) being of the second canon of the old testament of the bible, and unaccepted by some christians a book which is part of the apocrypha. At death the lost go immediately to a place of torment; thus there is no purpose in praying for them (Lk. Apocrpha Vs. Deutrocanonical ... One of the preists in our church says we call them the deutrocanonicl books, because apocrypha means "lost" and our church doesnt beleive that they are lost, but rather they are part of our current bible. Then, ‘That all Scripture are to be expounded according to the Sense of this Roman “For Hebrews 10:10-14 By the which will we are sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all. no Canonical Scriptures, unless he gives them Authority and Allowance so to be.’ Wisdom of Solomon, Ecclesiasticus or Sirach, In addition, the Jewish Aquila version of the Old Testament (early 2nd century), which supplanted the Septuagint, did not contain the Apocrypha.” (The Apocrypha also called Deutero-Canonical Writings by Lloyd Thomas;http://ftp.iafrica. Consider this quote from II Maccabees 12:43-45: He also took up a collection… and sent it to Jerusalem to provide for a sin offering…For if he were not expecting that those who had fallen asleep would arise again, it would have been superfluous and foolish to pray for the dead… Therefore he made atonement for the dead, that they might be delivered from their sin. 5. 157 A.D. Polcrates – “Before St John died, (who died the last of all the Apostles), the Canon of the Scriptures was made perfect and delivered over to the Christian Church. from the time of Malachi no further canonical writings were composed. Following Are The Reasons The Apocryphal Books Are Rejected By Bible Believers: 1. July 2006 edited July 2006 in Faith Issues. The KJV New Testament was translated from the Textus Receptus. It is always best to dismiss claims AFTER seeing the evidence. II My Discourse is continued, and not interrupted with quotations of Authors, which I have 11 And every priest standeth daily ministering and offering oftentimes the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins: 12 But this man, after he had offered one sacrifice for sins for ever, sat down on the right hand of God; 13 From henceforth expecting till his enemies be made his footstool. In fact, “after his death, and literally ‘over his dead body,’ the Apocryphal books were brought into his Latin Vulgate translation directly from the Old Latin Version.” (Outlines on Church History:The Collection of the Old Testament Scriptures – The Canon; http:// thechristian.org/church_history/ot_history.html; p.2). Included are Athanasius, Origen, Cyril of Jerusalem, Bishop Melito of Sardis (170 AD), Tertullian, and Hilary of Poitiers. 1:6,19; 5:6), this is not a proven fact. histories or to facts given directly by revelation. Here are some of the problems. It was Origen (circa 185-254) the heretic “who first included the Apocrypha with the Bible.” The deuterocanonical books (from the Greek meaning "belonging to the second canon") are books and passages considered by the Catholic Church, the Eastern Orthodox Church, the Oriental Orthodox Churches and the Assyrian Church of the East to be canonical books of the Old Testament but which are considered non-canonical by Protestant denominations. inviolately, undoubtedly and devoutly professed, taught, preached, and received as The angel Raphael teaches sorcery & magic which God forbids. The book of Judith contains the account of how a supposedly godly widow destroyed one of Nebuchadnezzar’s generals through deceit and sexual offers. As I just noted, they do not go to purgatory; they do go to Hades (Hell). The following list is the 7 books that the Catholics include that the Protestants do not. detained are helped by the Suffrages of the Living, and the saying of Masses. II Maccabees also contains the heresy that deceased saints are interceding in heaven for those on earth (15:11-14). Apocrypha vs Deuterocanonical •Protestant churches use the term Apocrypha •Some see these books as being worthy of study but not as canonical •Others do not use them at all •The RC church uses the term Deuterocanonical as it sees them as canonical •Eastern Orthodox Churches recognize several other 1 Esdras, 2 Esdras, Tobit, Judith, The Septuagint includes a number of books commonly referred to as the Old Testament Apocrypha – for example, Tobit, Wisdom, I and II Maccabees, and Judith. So, why was the Apocrypha included in the early English Bibles? preserved by the Jews. These writings are not “God breathed,” as 2 Ti. Consider this quote from II Maccabees 12:43-45: “He also took up a collection … and sent it to Jerusalem to provide for a sin offering. 4. These false teachings must be contrasted with Le. Both the Trent and the Pope declared anyone who rejected the Apocrypha as a part of the Bible’s Canon “Anathema” or “Damno…Anathematizo.” That simply means permanently condemned and damned to Hell. Many Protestants have attested to the value of the deuterocanonical books and the Apocrypha. There are major problems with the book of Those who do not believe on Christ are “condemned already” (John 3:18). It is also important to note that Judith’s counsel regarding resisting Nebuchadnezzar was contrary to that given by God’s prophet Jeremiah (Je. This holds good for the so-called “Wisdom of Solom… Teaching that alleges that giving or any other works purges sin is inconsistent with the Bible. Many non-Catholic Bible are now being published that contain the Apocrypha. 16:22-23). No canon or council of the Church for the first four centuries recognized the Apocrypha as inspired. under one kind only, (the bread only) yet it is lawful, and a complete Communion, The attribution of a great name of the distant past to a book by its real author, who thus effaced his own personality, was, in some cases at least, a mere literary fiction which deceived no one except the ignorant. The language that I use, is familiar, clear, and inoffensive, (which I trust will make it the more acceptable), for I neither , nor approve any other. notwithstanding that our Savior otherwise appointed it. 10. and knowledge of all persons that can but read or hear it. The word Apocrypha was coined by the 5th-century Catholic Bible scholar Sophronius Eusebius Hieronymus, better known as Jerome, for the books received by the Roman Catholic Church of his time that were a part of the Greek version of the Old Testament, yet, were not included in the Hebrew Bible. Scriptures are quoted. The Deuterocanonical Books of the Bible These are books which are included in some version of the canonical Bible, but which have been excluded at one time or another, for textual or doctrinal issues. times that His people were to do good to their enemies and not only toward the righteous. Jewish and New Testament sources both agree that no divinely inspired prophetic utterance occurred during this time. First, the Roman Catholic influence played a major part. In his address “To the Reader” Dr. Cosin explains his purpose in writing this 225 page book. 5. Noteworthy examples of ancient fiction they might be, but such books have absolutely no place among the seven-times purified Word of God (Ps. Diverse years before his death he had made chief abode about Ephesus, and Sardis, and the other Churches in Asia, to which he wrote when he was banished into the Isle of patmos by the Emperor Domitian. Peter, as Prince of the Apostles; by virtue whereof his Papal Determinations and Greek additions to Esther and instituted by Christ himself in the New Testament. The Greek word, "apocrypha," means hidden and, indeed, those extra Old Testament books have been hidden from most non-Catholic readers. Some Apocryphal books, though written as history, are actually fiction. Consider the following questions and answer them. The Apocryphal books were rejected from the canon of Scripture by the early church leaders.“It is a significant fact that the best of the early Fathers adopted the Hebrew canon as giving the authoritative Scriptures of the O.T.” (Analytical, p. 1083). This angel professes to be “one of the seven holy angels who present the prayers of the saints and enter into the presence of the glory of the Holy One” (Tobit 12:15). 3. 4:14-16; 8:1-2; 1 Jn. historians and prophets of the O.T. Luke 16:19-31 makes that very clear. they should not be used to establish doctrine. corrupting influences upon the early church as well as upon the copies of the Bible. The Roman Catholic Church, at the Council of Trent in 1546, decreed certain apocryphal Introduction. could just as easily be allusions to other O.T. more will follow that perilous path in the future. Origen was one of the greatest before the definite separation of the Church from Judai… Vicar of Deputy of Christ, and in that Sovereign Authority the true Successor of St. That Whosoever will not fall down before Relics and Images, to kiss and worship I turn your attention to the preface of the Geneva Bible of 1560 which includes this special While he did include some them in his translation, he noted that they should not be used to establish doctrine. The Bible clearly condemns magicical practices such as this (consider De. Yet, we need to go way back to Jerome, translator of the Latin Vulgate in 405 AD for the answer. Neither praying for the dead, nor saying masses for the dead will change the state of the ones who have died, You can pray for departed loved ones till you are blue in the face and spend every last penny you possess to get a priest to say masses for the dead but that will not change the eternal state of those who are unsaved. In fact, many, but not all, of the great church Fathers of the early church spoke out against the Apocrypha or confirm the exclusion of the Apocrypha by their count of the Old Testament books. In 1979, the Apocryphal/Deuterocanonical Books were added to the Good News Bible and published as Good News Bible: Today's English Version with Deuterocanonicals/Apocrypha and also later published as part of subsequent Catholic and Orthodox Editions. 11. 5 My brothers were handsome and tall, but the Lord was not pleased with them. making offering to atone for the sins of the dead. Profession of the Tridentine Faith, ‘That the Canonical Scriptures themselves shall be Even a hurried reading of the Apocryphal books reveals the fact that here we are touching the uninspired writings of men apart from divine inspiration. 4.6 out of 5 stars 231. It is a matter of Fact this, that is here tried, which may be put to a Jury of Twelve Men, that have no lawful Exception to be taken against them; but I give them more, and put it to many such, one after another; that there may be no want which in such case, as this is, will be the fairest way of Trial to find out the Truth, and leave the Reader to judge of it, on whose side it standeth. ought to be religiously invocated (prayed to); and that they understand as well the Christ in his Church, which anciently put the same into practice; and that the denial by Dr. David L. Brown. The Apocrypha contain teachings wholly contrary to the other books of the Bible. They teach that the faithful on earth can be of great help to persons who have died and are undergoing purgatory by offering for them the sacrifice of the Mass, prayers, almsgiving, and other religious deeds. Were those 7 books removed by the Protestants, or added by the Catholics? ‘The feeling of the leaders at that time,’ Torrey tells us, ‘is echoed in a later Palestinian writing (Midrash Qoheleth, 12,12): “Whosoever brings together in his house more than twenty-four books (the canonical scriptures) brings confusion.’” (The King James Version Defended by Dr. Edward F. Hills; Chapter 4). Also He. They quote him on “other matters” yet when he lists what is in the Canon of Scripture he does not include “Tobit and Judith, or any other of the books that are now in question.” In fact, “there is no mention at all,which is a sign, that in those days they were to be no Canonical Parts of the Scripture.”. English (wikipedia canon) Noun The focus of this book is to make it clear to the Christian Church that the Apocrypha was not and is not a part of Holy Scripture. I should note that Orthodox “Christians” (Greek, Russian, Serbian, Orthodox, etc) usually the Song of the Three Young Men, Susanna, and Bel and the Dragon. We must remember that the N.T. You should know another thing. Lampe; Cambridge University Press; p.92). Some seven books and about that many portions of other books are included. 10. The word deuterocanonical means second list. They were not received as inspired Scripture by the churches during the first four centuries after Christ. The word apocrypha means "hidden," while the word deuterocanonical means "second canon." Declaration of an ancient General Council (the Second among the first four) received The influence toward crediting these writings with Bible authority did not begin until the 4th Century in the North African church. Alexander McClure, who was a biographer of the KJV translators, writes: “…the Apocryphal books in those times were more read and accounted of than now, though by no means placed on a level with the canonical books of Scripture” (Translators Revived, Alexander McClure, p. 185). The background to this theory goes like this: Jesus and the Apostles, being Jews, used the same Bible Jews use today. “So now, my children, consider what almsgiving accomplishes and how righteousness delivers” (Tobit 14:11). At this point I want to share with you some information from an interesting little book I recently purchased called The Scholastic History of The Canon of The Holy Scripture written in 1657 by Dr. John Cosin of Cambridge University. “The Apocrypha had been introduced into the English version of the Coverdale Bible in 1535, and was included in the King James version in 1611 between the Old and New Testaments. 1:3; Jam. For example, the title of these books in Luther’s 1534 German translation of the Bible reads, “Apocrypha, that is, books which are not held equal to the sacred Scriptures, and nevertheless are useful and good to … Though some of the Apocryphal books perhaps do have historical value, giving information writers were familiar with the Apocrypha, it is plain that they did not directly quote from these books. Scriptures are not the product of man, but of God. passages (Mt. naturally comes up, why were they included in virtually all the early English Bibles and yet they are not in our most non-Catholic Bibles today? 4. The Apocrypha / Deuterocanonical books teach many things that are not true and are not historically accurate. That after this Life there is a penal Purgatory to be undone for the Expiation as well What are the Catholic Apocrypha / Deuterocanonical books? He counseled that those books not available in Hebrew canon were to be reckoned among the apocryphal writings. Where should I begin. It is also important to note that Judith’s counsel regarding resisting Nebuchadnezzar was contrary to that given by God’s prophet Jeremiah (see Jeremiah 38:14). Further, he taught infants should be baptized for the forgiveness of sin and many other heresies. It will not even get them a cup of cold water in Hell. The King James Bible and the Apocrypha. 10:10-14 says believers have been perfected forever through Christ’s one sacrifice. of venial Sins, as the payment of temporal punishment due to mortal sins; as the 7. (Note: I have kept the capitalization, wording and spelling as it appears in the original). In the fall 2001 I received an American Bible Society catalog and to my surprise, there I saw Bible after Bible that contained the Apocrypha. 3:16 says all Scripture is. Apocrypha vs Deuterocanonical. Luther included a note on the Apocrypha which stated, “These are books not to be held in equal esteem with those of Holy Scripture…”. Holy Bible with the Apocryphal / Deuterocanonical Books [New Revised Standard Version (NSRV)] American Bible Society. BEWARE OF THE APOCRYPHA! However, after they passed from the scene, muddled hierarchs started adding books to the Bible either out of ignorance or because such books helped back up variou… These apocryphal books were positioned between the Old and New Testament (it also contained maps and geneologies).