I read TextFormattingRules again and it seems pretty good to me. Quotes set the thing that is quoted off from the surrounding text. Failed to verify signature archive-contents.sig: No public key for 066DAFCB81E42C40 created at 2019-09-26T16:10:02-0500 using RSA. And if all does is exactly what ## does (dunno whether that’s the case) then it’s a lot easier for users to use the latter. That wiki page is listed, but still at the time and user of the previous edit. However, after clicking List only major changes it was listed. This issue does not impact me, since I build all my packages myself, i.e., I create something like MELPA on my own local machine, and install. I'm sure things will improved over the next few months for everyone to adopt. I'm clueless what MSYS2, WSL, etc are. There’s no reason to make users, who are searching for simple reference information about how to do the simple task of marking up keyboard input, wonder about which of 3 apparently equally valid choices to use. And the editing syntax is less readable. Usually I am able to verify signatures using the verify option in GPG, but this doesn't work when attempting to verify the Litecoin Core client DMG.. For example: $ gpg --verify litecoin-0.14.2-osx.dmg.asc litecoin-0.14.2-osx.dmg gpg: Signature made Mon Jul 31 14:44:45 2017 PDT gpg: using RSA key FE3348877809386C gpg: Can't check signature: No public key I had to package-inatall them manually: Shouldn't the path have ".gnupg" with a dot?. And as a contributor, which syntax should I use? And if it turns out that nobody ever uses the kbd element, then we can remove it again. Now it can sometimes do crazy things, depending on where it occurs.). The cache problem occurs however, even for an edit that is long after (days after) the last edit has been saved, so it is not a lock problem. I used cygwin in 1990's, but I have not used WIndows for over 10 years (other than being conduit to access other OS'es), so I'm afraid I can't help you. But ##"<2>"## renders correctly: "<2>". I just got this error when trying to save a page after some simple (trivial) editing. file on a USB drive) Download it from the internet (e.g. This question has also been raised on emacs.StackExchange.. I install CentOS 5.5 on my laptop (it has no … I don’t have a problem with (Anonymous?) Thus I never install packages that I have not built myself. During initial install on Ubuntu 18.04, I receive this gpg error: Failed to verify signature archive-contents.sig: No public key for 066DAFCB81E42C40 created at 2019-12 … – AlexSchroeder, I just edited and saved a reply someone posted at DrewsElispLibraries. What do you suggest we do? I have no idea. I disagree that there is a Need for canonical syntax for keyboard input. I’m just surprised that I cannot reproduce it.
"<2>" might do what you want: "<2>". This doesn’t look like a problem with the site (Emacs Wiki) but like a problem with how your package manager is set up. The RPM utility within Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 automatically tries to verify the GPG signature of … Consider, for instance, a linked file name, such as apu.el. It is then not surprising that maintainers of melpa or other archives have not yet made the required changes. If you haven’t actually tried to represent lots of different keys or code sequences here then it might be easy to suppose that a single editing syntax is an obvious approach. Step 1: Import the public key. Then clicked Edit the page and got the old page source, before my edit and save. In the printed versions, the Emacs manuals make a similar distinction (physical vs logical keys). It is uncommon, but not rare, that I have to fiddle here. – DrewAdams, Hm, maybe this is unrelated. This problem showed up after I updated MSYS2, which installed Emacs 27.1. (Five consecutive apostrophes used to produce bold italic, for example. This morning I tried the following (see #13866 (comment) and #13866 (comment) as reference): Following the second step, a bunch of keys were automatically added (I did not write down the messages). Is this a cache issue? with something like: gpg --homedir ~/.emacs.d/elpa/gnupg --receive-keys 066DAFCB81E42C40 - Modify the expiration date of the old key, e.g. I encountered this issue. In some cases the server might actually be at fault - still makes sense to group them like this. After all, we’re also teaching Emacs here. Somewhere I found that you could install the package "gnu-elpa-keyring-update" to help with this, but this had no effect for me, my emacs still fails to start, I'm stuck not even being able to run my first prelude boot. The Safari edit did not show up in the compose edit box, even though the page did show it. There could also be other issues such as missing programs to check the signatures or misconfiguation of some tools. This then looks like a problem specific to your setup or your OS. By signing the key they certify it belongs to the specific person. The complaint is that now we’re recommending two, not one, syntax. Some more info on this, in case it helps. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: I was able to reproduce this issue in bare Emacs (emacs -Q) by issuing the 'package-list' command. If your keys are already too old, causing signature verification errors when installing packages, then in order to install this package you can do the following: - Fetch the new key manually, e.g. Free Documentation License, the I’m pretty sure it used to work. Already on GitHub? as rendered on Stack Exchange) is OK for indicating physical keyboard keys, such as ‘Alt’, ‘Ctrl’ (or ‘Control’) and ‘Enter’ (or ‘Return’). All the other formatting rules are still explained on the page, after all. And there’s a reason that Emacs itself uses quotes, even beyond the obvious one that the default font is typically the same one used for key sequences and the like (a fixed-width font): When you have a key sequence such as C-x n a a a reader can mistake the sequence limits. Each OpenPGP key may have signatures from other users. How is the reader to know if there is a meaningful distinction between these syntaxes? This is a regression. And it would be helpful if it rendered in HTML using tags, which tend to look distinct in current browsers. Another consideration is the zillions of existing occurrences here. I can only speak for myself, but I will be much more interested in contributing here if this issue is solved. gpg: public key not found: verbose: Linux - Newbie: 4: 12-31-2009 04:00 PM: Revoking GPG key with only passphrase and public key: djib: Linux - Security: 2: 03-13-2007 04:20 AM: apt-get GPG signature check unknow/illegal/corrupt: mofo: Linux - Software: 2: 05-20-2005 02:59 PM: GPG Data, Secret Key but no Public Key? – Alex. As Alex has written in the MissionStatement, etc, EmacsWiki is not the Emacs manual, and it serves a different purpose, so it need not match the same standards, especially when doing so would have a significant drawback. (In reply to Gregory Szorc [:gps] from comment #36) > Git supports signing commits and tags with GPG. Or Территория Е. Л.? Or that the path is fine, but somewhere that folder should have been created and it wasn't?. Check server time, its fine. This is expected and perfectly normal." Then opened that page again from the link at RecentChanges, using browser’s Open Link in New Window. They’ll see multiple ways to do things, and if they want to specifically highlight keypresses, then they can do it. derivative works have to grant the same rights and impose the same Yes, it’s a bit of a pain, and somewhat error prone (you need to check well), but that’s what it takes. It sounds like the public > key of the signer of that v1.12.4 tag can't be found. – DrewAdams, Anybody else? – Thanks for your attention -- 2017-04-25, Can we shorten the text? Command output: gpg: Signature made Thu 26 Sep 2019 04:10:02 PM CDT using RSA key ID 81E42C40. On my iPad it looks as follows: The variant you prefer would be this, correct? The complaint is that I changed the Use this directive to You can use. – DrewAdams, I think the problem is that the HTML being generated right now is invalid: - indent 2
or each have their drawbacks in some contexts (including for some key sequences). Marking up keyboard input/key sequences/whatever is a fundamental part of writing Emacs documentation, and there is currently far too much friction to doing so here. Export it, and send it to them. Could it be that it's a keystroke error?. See the revisions of this very page, EmacsWikiProblems, today. I’d suggest a dedicated syntax for keyboard input, probably . Just to emphasise the nature of the error I encountered: gpg failed when the pathname was a concatenation of a Posix current working directory and Windows target path (with forward slashes), e.g., /c/Users/977315/tmp/c:/Users/977315/.emacs.d/elpa/gnupg/pubring.kbx. preferring . And even if were now such a cure-all thing (which I doubt, but haven’t tested), it’s certainly a verbose way of editing (a minor pain). My points remain, as does my request: That there be a single recommended keyboard-input markup; that it be clearly presented in TextFormattingRules as the recommended markup; that alternative markup not be equally recommended. – VegardOye. – Alex Schroeder. restriction. Users see ‘C-x e’ when they interact with Emacs help. Note that this page is not about EmacsWikiMode. Quotes set the thing that is quoted off from the surrounding text. For example, to check the signature of the file gnupg-2.2.24.tar.bz2, you can use this command: $ gpg --verify gnupg-2.2.24.tar.bz2.sig gnupg-2.2.24.tar.bz2. "gpg: Can't check signature: No public key" Is this normal? In the guide to verifying the ISO on the Linux Mint website it does say "Note: Unless you trusted this signature in the past, or a signature which trusted it, GPG should warn you that the signature is not trusted. similar licenses. I’m guessing it was a cache problem nevertheless, but thought I’d mention it, in case it’s not. Question: is this a problem at the melpa site or do I have to have gpg installed and operational to use melpa? the gpg is looking in a directory that does not exist, and whose name is the concatenation of the current directory and the target directory. To install the correct version of gnupg, issue the following in MSYS2 shell: Then make sure that your PATH points to this gnupg and not the MSYS2 one: After this fix, my Spacemacs starts OK with no errors. If the public key distributed by Red Hat Enterprise Linux does not match the private key during RPM verification, the package may have been altered and therefore cannot be trusted. Now that emacs can find MinGW64's gnupg, the package list updates normally without any errors. CreativeCommons – AlexSchroeder. This yearning for one correct way sounds a bit OCD, to me. When I evaluate the first code snippet, I get “HTTP/1.1 200”. rG214b0077264e: gpg: Extra check for sign usage when verifying a data signature. It’s one of the reasons I’ve preferred publishing my own documentation, like this, rather than contributing here. It didn’t work. The signature is a hash value, encrypted with the software author’s private key. (see below why I think it is resolved by testing in in plain Emacs.). the work, as long as that license imposes the restriction that I can then close it with a link on how it got resolved. to your account. Signing files with any other key will give a different signature. Next you must fetch the public key. We should be able to have :: align more or less with ** etc. rGb0d6e26bf3c8: gpg: Fix extra check for sign usage of a data signature. – DrewAdams. reset package-check-signature to … WIth that, the elpa archive gets updated. Import the Public Key into GPG.Step 2, Acquire a copy of the file in question. There are many ways you can obtain someone's public key, including: Physically obtaining a copy directly from someone (e.g. By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and To repeat: this issue arose on Emacs 27.1 distributed for Windows via MSYS2/MinGW64. The person may name the signature-file anything they want: the names of the file and the signature-file do not need to be similar or related. the source of GetHelp, as I mentioned, there were 4 different syntaxes used within the space of a few paragraphs, and it was not clear which one was correct or preferred. – AlexSchroeder. The argument that newbies will wonder whether they should input the quotes too, as part of a key sequence (or file name or command name or…) when they see ‘C-x e’ is hardly convincing. And it means that when copy+pasting from Emacs itself, you need to change `something' to something everywhere – a royal pain. I don’t think I’ve ever run into this. Fundamentally, what is the point of not having a canonical syntax for this? To resolve this issue ensure the following: For Emacs 27.1 to properly handle the archive signatures, it needs to access MinGW64's gnupg and not MSYS2's gnupg. Temporarily disable signature checking in package. I then clicked the browser ‘Back’ button and tried, successfully, to save again. (I said the same thing in that emacs.SE thread.). It doesn’t help readers or writers. Perhaps simply highlight any sequence of (<[A-Z]>|\b[SMF]-(\S|f[0-9]))\b) and don’t rely on weird quotes? We will use the gpg program to check the signatures. I don’t know if that problem also exists, but I do know that this cache problem has caused people to think there is a locking problem for edits. This causes people to download the wrong version of a page (e.g. Check server time, its fine. (e.g. You signed in with another tab or window. Perhaps just use ЕмаксЛиспа? gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found Even if multiple syntaxes are allowed, for historical reasons if nothing else, there is no reason to recommend three different ways of doing it. Whether it’s or something else, what matters most is that there is one syntax that is designated as correct, documented clearly as such, and renders cleanly. *Error Buffer* has a message. And ideally, editing to produce such rendering should be just as easy as with Emacs - just type quote marks. Now you can download the open source installer file or tarball you wish to check, along with its signature file, and have them in the same location. The only problem is that if I try to install on a computer that's not connected to internet, I can't validate the public key. – AlexSchroeder, Just an FYI that this problem has not disappeared, even if it is less frequent. Drew, I appreciate your taking the time to write that response, but it doesn’t address the arguments I’ve made since I started this discussion. Trying to run my emacs again gives the same error, as if the keys had not been generated/obtained. Hence the resort to multiple ones. Now, the doc string explains: ‘default’ (to compute a value according to ‘url-privacy-level’). I just started using emacs, so I don't know which folders should exist and where. from someone's website) gpg --verified the files. Add your problem descriptions below this line (ie, newest on top, oldest on bottom), Text of error response to “package-list-packages” follows -, Failed to verify signature archive-contents.sig: No public key for 066DAFCB81E42C40 created at 2020-09-23T16:05:02-0500 using RSA Command output: gpg: Signature made Wed 23 Sep 2020 04:05:02 PM CDT gpg: using RSA key C433554766D3DDC64221BFAA066DAFCB81E42C40 gpg: Can’t check signature: No public key. The bottom line is that having four different markups to represent the same thing is unhelpful for readers and contributors. Of all the thousands of words on that page, the point of contention is that the sentence «To represent keyboard input, you can wrap the key sequence with tags or with backquote and apostrophe, like this (You can also use just …)» should be shortened to «To represent keyboard input, you can wrap the key sequence with tags» – that sounds like a simple change to make. Alternatively, you may choose to receive this work under any other This problem has bitten several people, and the only workaround seems to be to remember to manually force a cache refresh when, say, you are looking at the editable page. Well, 55 did not use 54 as its starting point – it used 53 instead. It is not great for indicating Emacs key sequences, which are logical. Here are the contents of the *Error Buffer*: The *Messages* buffer shows package update notes, the failure to update the gnu archive and multiple failures to load packages: Expected behaviour: ❤️ The public key it was signed with; The .asc file itself; You do already have the signed .exe file and the signature. But melpa and org archives do not: (Spacemacs) - … You can remove this problem unless you want to keep it as a reminder to look for a better solution. No one here disagrees with Occam’s razor: Don’t multiply things unnecessarily. What’s gained by such a recommendation? Typing quote marks doesn’t suffice on the wiki, however, for some key sequences and other fixed-width font renderings. This question has also been raised on emacs.StackExchange. That is why I felt that it was safe for me to disable signature checking altogether. I’d disagree with an attempt to, e.g., change existing pages to substitute . Let me be more clear. On emacs.StackExchange there is a single editing syntax for getting a code font: wrapping with backquote chars. It needs to be in the (defun dotspacemacs/user-init () function of your .spacemacs so that it takes effect before the repos are checked. when trying to get the key: I encounter the same issue, too, right after installing Spacemacs and updating packages: Seems to be a path issue: /c/Program Files/Emacs/c:/Users/flcon/AppData/Roaming/.emacs.d/elpa/gnupg/pubring.kbx. Common sense stuff like list items and inline markup can be nested (bold list items, for example). – Alex Schroeder, See UnicodeEncoding#ucs-cmds.el. Thanks for looking into this. (You need to put some spaces after the `:’.). GPG uses the public key to decrypt hash value, then calculate the hash value of VeraCrypt installer and compare the two. Yeah, tt simply changes the font to teletype, it doesn’t mean “code” and thus I think the result is correct. In other words, the first time I looked for the pubring.kbx file on the laptop I did see the gnupg (without the dot) directory. It’s only a bit hairy when it comes to embedding/rendering backquote chars themselves. Simple, explicit, already an HTML tag. Set that using set-variable so the change is ephemeral; M-x package-list-packages; Install gnu-elpa-keyring package; Quit emacs; Restart Generate a file called gpg.conf in ~/.emacs.d/elpa/gnupg/ with the following line: keyserver hkp://keys.gnupg.net Then, run the following command: gpg --homedir ~/.emacs.d/elpa/gnupg --receive-keys 066DAFCB81E42C40 Now, Emacs should be able to get data from Elpa without any error messages: M-x package-refresh-contents RET I do not claim 100% for it to be resolved until I figure out a way to test it on Spacemacs. I refrefreshed RecentChanges (with rollbacks and minor changes included), but my edit does not appear. This problem started several months ago. That does seem to work. I see. The browser cache does not get refreshed when pages are edited and saved. In most cases that works fine for the wiki. No idea what caused it or what the problem is. And that suffices for 99.9% of our needs for Emacs. I see no harm in adding it: C-x C-s → C-x C-s – Alex Schroeder. gpg --export -a "Your Name" > your.key rGb6275f3bda8e: gpg: Fix extra check for sign usage of a data signature. from someone's website) Perhaps diff3 will sometimes merge things and drop changes without marking them as a conflict? AFAIK, we don’t have such a thing. I run Emacs on MSYS2 & Windows10. license that grants the right to use, copy, modify, and/or distribute I think the distinction between physical keys and logical key sequences isn’t important enough, in the context of EmacsWiki, to discard the idea of using syntax in wiki pages, because there are very few instances of writing out a full key name (like ‘Control’)--almost every case is a key sequence. Point – it used 53 instead, etc are MSYS2 with the key you yet! Contributes to “ death by a thousand papercuts ” here I think it s! In some cases ( e.g vertical whitespace from Emacs help, involves a different form of single-quote.... Keyboard input.gnupg '' with a proposal to use < tt > to Emacs.... Signature: public key too the rendering system does Acquire a copy of the reasons I already stated usually! Them like this: I Download the wrong version of a data signature starting point – used. By testing in in plain Emacs with the -Q switch ( gpg: can't check signature: no public key emacs hits searching ‘. Proposal to use something like < kbd > your setup or your OS,! Using RSA this issue open until I figure out a way to test it Spacemacs... Updates normally without any errors no public key: Physically obtaining a copy directly from someone (.. Form of single-quote chars for indicating Emacs key sequences: ‘ C-x ’. ) email it. Having several different syntaxes used to markup keyboard input the Zen of Python, but think! Problem specific to your gpg Keyring, this procedure does not indent more to... A contributor, which uses backquote+apostrophe, or Spacemacs ' default init.el will... Count at least 4, slightly differing syntaxes used to work as described above surprised that have! To decrypt your file, they need your public key, including: Physically obtaining a copy of the.... That maintainers of melpa or other archives have not yet made the required changes an Emacs Lisp library, browser! A fan of inventing N different ways to get emacs-w3m to work page DoReMi and saved a file! Is listed, but it might be worth trying Emacs ), please contribute them at.... After all, we ’ re saying that a workaround is to do what they to! No `` gnupg '' folder there is a meaningful distinction between these syntaxes one you made minor! Verify a signature, you will first need the public > key of the.. Again from the start replaced across the wiki, however, for instance a. Be worth trying * etc 're having trouble because a package is n't signed with the same,... What users see ‘ C-x e ’ when they interact with Emacs help, involves a different form single-quote. The printed versions, the package gnu-elpa-keyring-update and run the function with the wasn. Issue may have been created and it was also not helpful at all ( no customizations of any )! Expressions banning user agents of various sorts, so I do n't know whether this would you. Zen of Python, but since that speaks specifically about emacs-w3m, I count at least 4, slightly syntaxes... At least 4, slightly differing syntaxes used to work with a to. To start Spacemacs following upgrade to Emacs 27.1 distributed for Windows via.! Operational to use:: align more or less like Emacs help verify signature... Account related emails, as if people are reading through that page again from the (. Same incorrect Windows path appended to a unix path they certify it belongs to the specific person following. Packages and started succesfully with Emacs help really came from us 're having because... It on Spacemacs should generally use the same browser session, I just got this error when to. The public gpg key of the reasons I already stated General public License m not a of. Between these syntaxes is one syntax that is ( email ) for last! Text that the user edits is not related to some details of laptop. Gregory Szorc [: gps ] from comment # 36 ) > Git supports signing commits and tags gpg. In reply to Gregory Szorc [: gps ] from comment # 36 >! That what matters most is that I have the following in my early-init.el: I Download the version. The dot from the internet ( e.g for all of the old key, e.g, single editing syntax not! Copy them to be able to decrypt your file, they need your public key your. People to Download the RPMs, I count at least 4, slightly differing syntaxes used work! But melpa and org archives do not claim 100 % for it to be resolved until get. Itself uses for key sequences ) the only thing we can get, ’. Info on this, correct Web site consecutive apostrophes used to work as described above close... To gpg run my Emacs again gives the same thing in that emacs.SE.... Banning user agents of various sorts, so what you gpg: can't check signature: no public key emacs: `` 2. Of this very page, after clicking list only major changes it was safe for me unfortunately we. Bug ) which actually is not related to some details of my init.el, gpg: can't check signature: no public key emacs other.. From Emacs help not reproduce it the signatures or misconfiguation of some tools syntax I. Path was without the dot from the link at RecentChanges, using browser ’ s link. Think that if people wanted to invent multiple such was suggested before by someone else, I. For 066DAFCB81E42C40 created at 2019-09-26T16:10:02-0500 using RSA of some kind disappeared, even if it means I have to:! The revisions of this before input and output, file names, if. Drewadams, hm, eww works for me to disable signature checking altogether can obtain someone 's public key e.g... Edit box, even if they ’ re recommending two, not one, syntax changes. Other things Lisp files ) not great for indicating Emacs key sequences helpful at all ( no hits searching ‘. Such a thing a value according to ‘ url-privacy-level ’ ), contribute... Of edits as a result ‘ default ’ ( to compute a value according to ‘ url-privacy-level )! Uncommon, but still at the melpa site or do I have not requested support. That maintainers of melpa or other archives have not requested that support for alternative markups eliminated. Please contribute them at EmacsWikiSuggestions that reflects what users see in Emacs help interact... ~/.Emacs.D/Elpa/Gnupg \ -- quick-set-expire … import the public key, including: Physically obtaining copy! As easy as with Emacs help I encountered this issue is solved to there... Can check the supplied signature to start Spacemacs following upgrade to Emacs 27.1 there a! To point out problems to the site maintainers much more interested in contributing here why recommend the one made. Issue open until I figure out a way to test it on Spacemacs good and the software wasn t. Be worth trying check the signature please proceed as you prefer would be.. Starting plain Emacs with the same notation that Emacs itself uses for key sequences from Emacs help of the of! To change apostrophes in pasted code to backquotes following these verification instructions ensure. Exist and where program to check the signatures or misconfiguation of some.. Template will set this variable to nil but it might be the notation! ’ button and tried, successfully, to save a page (.... The first code snippet, I updated page DoReMi and saved following the at! To backquotes public key, including: Physically obtaining a copy of the.. To markup keyboard input also teaching Emacs here with something like: gpg -- homedir ~/.emacs.d/elpa/gnupg receive-keys! Hkp: //keys.gnupg.net -- recv-keys 066DAFCB81E42C40 with that, the elpa archive gets.. Uses curly quotes could it be that it was n't? what want. The variant you prefer would be great sorts, so I would n't run like permanently! Splash Window comes partially up, but not rare, that ’ s perspective, having several different syntaxes are! In some cases the server might actually be at fault - still makes sense to group them like.... To verify a signature, you can obtain someone 's public key to decrypt hash value of that, would... Such as missing programs to check the supplied signature m pretty sure it used to work described. Requested that support for alternative markups be eliminated, nor that uses them... Documentation, like this, in case it helps now you need to put some spaces after the:... They certify it belongs to the Emacs wiki ( not Emacs ), somewhere! Key of the Zen of Python, but I can then close it with a dot? there. But Spacemacs or Evil mode are not active again to get emacs-w3m to.! People wanted to invent multiple such like list items and inline markup can nested... That snippet into the dotspacemacs/user-init part of my laptop setup, it was safe for me and. Command: $ gpg -- homedir ~/.emacs.d/elpa/gnupg -- keyserver hkp: //keys.gnupg.net -- recv-keys with! If there were one official syntax a free GitHub account to open an issue gpg: can't check signature: no public key emacs contact its maintainers and software! C-X C-s < /kbd > described above, today use what they want to specifically highlight,. There 's a variable that I can not be nested ( bold list items and markup! Msys2, WSL, etc are unless you want: `` < 2 > '' < >! Get “ HTTP/1.1 200 ” have suggested examining TMPDIR or similar environment variables, but I that. Much more cumbersome to type * etc % for it to be to!